Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Concerning Obama's Birth Certificate

This is unbelievable. Read this article in World Net Daily.

If you read the entire article, it basically states that Congress would have to request a review of the actual birth certificate, but when it's a Democrat-heavy Congress, the self-interest of these politicians is going to trump any attempt at getting to the truth of this matter. The Democrats want Obama elected president and I do not believe they will request a review of the actual birth certificate. (Now I'm not opposed to Democrats in general, but it's true that there's something fishy going on with this whole election!)

People keep saying how you can see the birth certificate online and the original has been shown to FactCheck.org so we need to stop complaining, but since FactCheck is affiliated with Obama and has supported his campaign, that's obviously a HUGE conflict of interest. There has to be a non-biased third party reviewing this birth certificate. Not only that, but I wouldn't trust a thing that is shown online as "proof" of anything. We all know how easy it is to manipulate documents electronically so that's ridiculous for people to say, "Go to his website. The birth certificate is right there." Any of us could create the same thing.

It's going to come down to the states demanding the right to view it. With a primarily liberal Supreme Court, I also don't see this happening. They will find a way to dismiss these cases.

And again - people ask, "What's the big deal?"

Well, there was a reason our forefathers created the requirements for POTUS. It's almost as if we now have a whole group of people stating that these requirements are outdated and don't matter anymore. I heard someone the other day saying that Obama has a "right to privacy" and he doesn't think he should have to show his birth certificate...

I did read somewhere that we would be hearing a huge outcry from the Republican party if they didn't think Obama was a US citizen (and thus not an eligible candidate) and I haven't read anywhere that they are even concerned about this issue. (If anyone else has, I would appreciate reading the article/news related to this.) At the same time, I wonder if they are just keeping quiet on this particular issue because someone else was working on it and it seems like everything they point out about the man seems to be seen as an attack on him when it's nothing more than the truth of the matter (ACORN, abortion, increased taxes, etc.).

Anyday, if he is telling the truth and he really was born in Hawaii, why not just produce the birth certificate for everyone else besides FactCheck to see?

Sonya